What non-compliance costs
Article 77(1) is drafted as a condition of market access: from 18 February 2027 a covered battery placed on the EU market or put into service shall have a battery passport. There is no grace period in the text. Article 77(4) puts responsibility for that data being accurate, complete and up to date on the economic operator placing the battery on the market — it may authorise another operator in writing to act on its behalf, but the exposure stays where it is. Penalties are set by each Member State and therefore vary; the loss of market access does not.
Source: Art. 77(1) · Art. 77(4)
Open standards, and no vendor lock-in
Article 77(5) requires all passport information to be based on open standards and in an interoperable format, transferable through an open interoperable data exchange network without vendor lock-in, machine-readable, structured and searchable. The phrase vendor lock-in is in the operative text, not our gloss. Article 78(e) goes further: the passport must remain available after the economic operator ceases to exist or ceases its activity in the Union — while specifying no custodian, escrow arrangement or duration for achieving that. On standards: the six CEN/CLC/JTC 24 digital product passport standards, EN 18216, 18219, 18220, 18221, 18222 and 18223, were cited in the Official Journal by Implementing Decision (EU) 2026/1736 in support of the Ecodesign Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 only. No equivalent citation has been made under the Batteries Regulation, so they confer no presumption of conformity for battery passports today.
Source: Art. 77(5) · Art. 78(e)